-
Recent Posts
- How to expect the unexpected: Fast motion overrides inattentional blindness
- Introducing a Visual Illusion – the Scintillating Starburst
- Flexing: A maladaptive coping strategy of insecure narcissists?
- With great power comes great confidence – statistically
- Why it is important to take the virus seriously – or why this isn’t just like the flu
Recent Comments
Archives
- May 2023
- May 2021
- March 2021
- December 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- October 2019
- August 2019
- March 2019
- October 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- June 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- February 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
Categories
Meta
Echo chamber
Category Archives: Pet peeve
Is the overuse of low memory data types to blame for much of tribalism and overall nonsense one encounters online and offline?
The notion of “data types” is probably the most underrated concept outside of computer science that I can think of right now. Briefly, computers use “typed variables” to represent numbers internally. All numbers are internally represented as a collection of … Continue reading
Posted in Pet peeve, Philosophy
Leave a comment
What should we call science?
The term for science – scientia (knowledge) is terrible. Science is not knowledge. It is simply not (just) a bunch of facts. The German term “Wissenschaft” is slightly better, as it implies a knowledge creation engine. Something that creates knowledge, … Continue reading
Beyond free will
Some say that every time philosophy and neuroscience cross, philosophy wins. The usual reason cited for this? Naive and unsophisticated use of concepts and the language to express them within neuroscience. Prime exhibit is the mereological fallacy – the confusion … Continue reading
Posted in Neuroscience, Pet peeve, Philosophy
1 Comment
Mary revisited: The Brian problem
Generations of philosophers have been fascinated what has been termed the “Mary problem“. In essence, Mary is the worlds foremost expert on color vision and knows everything that there is to know about it. The catch is that she is … Continue reading
Posted in Pet peeve, Philosophy
6 Comments
On the insinuation of bad intentions
Intentions matter. When assessing the merit or moral value of an action, we do not do so solely based on their outcomes, but take intentions into account. For instance, we consider it worse if someone breaks one cup in an attempt to … Continue reading
Posted in Pet peeve, Psychology, Social commentary, Technology
1 Comment
On “Kardashians” in science and the general relationship between achievement and fame
I am not in the habit of commenting on ephemeral events, but this was brought to my attention by interested parties in a decidedly snarky fashion which obliges me to respond. Briefly, Neil Hall introduced the “Kardashian index” to quantify the … Continue reading
Posted in Pet peeve, Science, Social commentary
2 Comments
Ideological opportunity cost (IOC)
Ideology interferes with an unbiased appraisal of reality. This – in itself – would be detrimental enough, but ideology is far more insidious than that. By nature, ideology is designed to be extremely self-serving and inherently creating in- and an out-groups. … Continue reading
Posted in Pet peeve, Philosophy, Social commentary
3 Comments
What should we call simulated data?
Data is not made. Data is born as a result of a measurement process. Taking measurements (in conjunction with a measurement theory) creates data. But then, what should we call – in contrast – the results of simulations, the output of … Continue reading
Posted in Pet peeve, Philosophy, Science
1 Comment
On the importance of consistent mapping
The problem I’m about to write about has been persisting for quite a while and I thought Google would have fixed it by now. Alas, no such luck, thus far. In a nutshell, we have been aware of the extreme … Continue reading
Posted in Misc, Optimization, Pet peeve
Leave a comment
PSA: Your “sleep monitor” is probably anything but
As the “quantified self” (probably ill-named) movement gains steam, all kinds of apps that purport to measure important physiological parameters that are related to health gain popularity. In principle, this development is to be welcomed, as individual lifestyle and metabolism … Continue reading
Charlemagne was a Neuroscientist
The exploits of Charlemagne are fairly well documented and widely known. He was both the King of the Franks and the founding emperor of the Holy Roman Empire (technically, the Carolingian Empire). In this capacity, he is renowned for a wide … Continue reading
Posted in Neuroscience, Pet peeve, Science, Social commentary
2 Comments
Eponyms are stifling scientific progress.
An eponym is something that is named after a particular person. I would like to put forward a radical assertion: The habit of naming an idea or principle in honor of its purported discoverer or developer is holding Science back. Therefore, eponyms have … Continue reading
Posted in Pet peeve, Science
3 Comments
#Yannygate highlights the underrated benefits of keeping foxes around
In May 2018, a phenomenon surfaced that lends itself of differential interpretation – some people hear “Laurel” whereas others hear “Yanny” when listening to the same clip. As far as I’m concerned, this is a direct audio analogue of #thedress … Continue reading →